I as well as noticed abstract resemblances between the Filipino dimensions to own public jobs and you will outcomes and many out-of Goldberg’s (1982) conceptually-derived kinds for societal positions, relationships, and you will consequences on the English words. Specifically, Filipino Stature generally seems to include conditions inside Goldberg’s Fame, Influence, Popularity, and you may Importance kinds. Filipino Uselessness (inversely) is much like Goldberg’s Ability group. Intimate conceptual correspondences are also apparent between Filipino Attractiveness and you may Goldberg’s Appeal, and ranging from Filipino Respectability and Goldberg’s Respect. Filipino Charm generally seems to include a lot of Goldberg’s Interest, Charm, and you may Entertainment-worthy of classes, and many terms inside the Goldberg’s Desire class and additionally overlap with Filipino Uniqueness. Filipino Dangerousness is similar to Goldberg’s Prominence, Fearsomeness, and you may Antagonism kinds, and Filipino Destructiveness also overlaps which have Goldberg’s Antagonism. Naturally, two Filipino size which can be laid out generally from the physical feature terms, Energy and you will Presentableness, do not appear to coincide directly to almost any of Goldberg’s groups away from public positions and outcomes (although Goldberg’s Style group is sold with “presentable” since a term). We wish to remember that i failed to just be sure to build marker scales to have Goldberg’s (1982) conceptual classes in addition to their mind-report construction on English words was unknown. Complete, but not, all of our abstract assessment signifies that there clearly was a large amount of cross-cultural resemblance from the big categories of public opportunities and you can consequences, and this a number of Goldberg’s so much more simple conceptual kinds might combine on bigger dimensions within the self-statement studies.
A good amount of Goldberg’s smaller kinds, in addition to Nurturance, Succorance, Adjustment, Quality, Accountability, Forgivability, Styles, Government, Sex, and you can Religion do not display much conceptual resemblance into Filipino dimensions of social and you may real features
Having fun with shared parts and you may regression analyses, we revealed that the societal and physical trait proportions was in fact modestly to strongly related one or more Filipino attribute and you can evaluative size. The fresh new clearest exemption is actually the tiny Presentableness aspect. Regardless of the character-importance judgments your Filipino informants, the latest Presentableness measurement, which had been composed of physical appearance characteristics (e.grams., respectable, clean versus. dirty), might provide faster details about identity than the other public and you can physical attribute dimensions. At the same time, the latest Prominence and you may Elegance proportions-more another societal and bodily characteristic size-seem to target characteristics which can be pretty line of conceptually about Filipino characteristic and you may evaluative size.
The correlations discovered between all of the personal size while the trait characteristic dimensions recommend that terms and conditions to possess public jobs, statuses, and you may consequences get echo societal consequences on the version of characteristics. In reality, Angleitner mais aussi al. (1990) advised you to social positions and you can statuses echo the fresh new effect that faculties have toward anyone else. For example, Filipinos who possess Gregariousness characteristics will tend to be discussed by the themselves while others with regards to the social characteristics define the newest Charisma aspect (e.g., explanations delight or pleasure). Likewise, Filipinos who’ve Conscientiousness qualities are usually explained in terms of Respectability personal attributes (age.g., recognized, honorable). These you’ll be able to hyperlinks ranging from traits and you can public reputations could be checked directly in upcoming research by the correlating worry about-ratings on the feature proportions having observer studies with the personal and you can bodily trait proportions.
Particularly, because of the matchmaking from mind-thought of attractiveness to help you personal really-are (Diener, Wolsic, & Fujita, 1995), and body photo in order to both self-respect and you can eating conditions (Mintz & Betz, 1988), this new Attractiveness aspect you’ll provide an essential introduction inside health-related investigations
A practiced implication of one’s efficiency is the fact not very far could well be shed of the examining just the Filipino trait and you can evaluative size. Actually, given the result of the brand new joint part analysis ( Dining table dos ), specific words to have social and you may my link actual services could even be extra in order to existing trait and evaluative scales. However, if an individual were to put additional dimensions, not in the trait and you can evaluative size, the most appropriate individuals might possibly be Prominence and you may Attractiveness. The Stature measure would evaluate mind-seen social status or position, because Attractiveness size would assess self-recognized bodily appeal and you will charm.